$Jump to content
Newt Feed
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to United [email protected]English • 25d
Keir Starmer does not believe trans women are women, No 10 says

www.bbc.com

external-link
message-square
39
fedilink
58
external-link
Keir Starmer does not believe trans women are women, No 10 says

www.bbc.com

@[email protected] to United [email protected]English • 25d
message-square
39
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • flamingos-cant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3•25d

    Should a transwoman have the same rights and respect as a woman? Absolutely. Are they the same? No, they are not.

    ‘As a woman’, a trans woman is a woman, different from a cis woman sure, but still a woman. This statement is fairly absurd if you substitute trans with another adjective, like is a blonde woman different from a woman?

    Kier’s words are still not transphobia. There is no fear, dislike, prejudice, discrimination, harassment, or violence in his statement.

    The prejudice is denying the legitimacy of trans women as women. ‘Adult human female’ is a dog whistle for ‘not trans’, so by asserting that a woman is ‘an adult female’ he’s saying trans women aren’t women (and that trans men aren’t men).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3•
      edit-2
      24d

      removed by mod

      • flamingos-cant
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6•
        edit-2
        25d

        I use the term woman and you knew exactly what I meant

        I didn’t actually, I wrote that to probe out what you actually meant because I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

        A blonde woman is a description of a woman’s hair colour and you know this.

        And trans/cis is a descriptions of whether a woman was assigned female at birth or not. Woman is not synonymous with cis woman.

        They have different names, which you yourself, use for a reason.

        You give them different names, I’m using adjectives because the distinction matters in this context.

        ‘adult human female’ is not a dog whistle. It’s a legal and common-sense definition

        It really isn’t. When you meet someone irl, you brain doesn’t decide if it thinks they are a man or woman based on their chromosomes or some bioessentialist bs, it does it based of social ques because man/woman are social categories.

        I am not denying the legitimacy of transwomen [sic]; nor is Keir.

        But also:

        This is exactly the same as saying transwomen [sic] are not women, because they are not. They are transwomen [sic].

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5•25d

          I’ll probably fuck my terminology up here, forgive me, I try. Questions I have:

          Are there a lot of people who look at other people’s genitals in public toilets?

          Can these people be arrested because I think they might be perverts and I don’t want them looking at my kids?

          Are people going to have to start showing their genitals to security guards?

          Has someone given security guards the right to demand to see people’s genitals?

          How the fuck does that even work when someone’s had gender reassignment surgery?

          Presumably trans men must now use the women’s toilets?

          Does someone who’s had gender reassignment surgery need to bring their full medical history with them in order to prove they’re using the “correct” toilet?

          Not aimed particularly at you flamingos - just questions that are coming to mind reading this thread.

          Seems to me this would be a lot simpler if people would just stop looking at other people’s genitals in toilets uninvited.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3•24d

        A trans woman, and a cis woman are both subtypes of women. One used to be physically male, the other didn’t. Both are women and should be afforded the same treatment under law unless actually there’s actually reasonable issues created by that.

United [email protected]
[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

  • 6 users / day
  • 65 users / week
  • 243 users / month
  • 1.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.64K Posts
  • 24.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • GreatAlbatross
  • @[email protected]
  • BE: 0.18.0
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • Join Lemmy